Reasons: A digital argument mapping library for modern browsers
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Benchmarking Modern Web Browsers
Many different Web browsers are available on the Internet, free of charge. A browser performs several tasks, such as rendering Web pages on the screen and executing client-side code often embedded in Web pages. Users typically choose a browser that gives them a satisfying browsing experience, which is partly determined by the speed of the browser. This paper presents benchmark performance test ...
متن کاملJavaGL - A 3D Graphics Library in Java for Internet Browsers
This paper presents a 3D graphics library, or JavaGL, written in Java to provide 3D graphics capabilities over network. To make the 3D graphics library easy to learn and use, we define the application programming interface (API) in a manner quite similar to that of OpenGL, since OpenGL is a de facto industry standard. Furthermore, we have also developed a network library, or JavaNL, and combine...
متن کاملSame-Origin Policy: Evaluation in Modern Browsers
The term Same-Origin Policy (SOP) is used to denote a complex set of rules which governs the interaction of different Web Origins within a web application. A subset of these SOP rules controls the interaction between the host document and an embedded document, and this subset is the target of our research (SOP-DOM). In contrast to other important concepts like Web Origins (RFC 6454) or the Docu...
متن کاملChallenges and issues in terminology mapping: a digital library perspective
Effective information retrieval within digital libraries is limited by the lack of semantic interoperability between subject schemes used by online services and collections. The use of multiple terminologies and ad hoc modifications to standard schemes prevents users from cross searching multiple repositories, cross-sectoral resources and interdisciplinary material. In order to overcome this, i...
متن کاملConicting Reasons in the Small-Improvement Argument
The small-improvement argument is usually considered themost powerful argument against comparability, viz the view that for any two alternatives an agent is rationally required either to prefer one of the alternatives to the other or to be indierent between them. We argue that while there might be reasons to believe each of the premises in the small-improvement argument, there is a conict bet...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Open Source Software
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2475-9066
DOI: 10.21105/joss.01044